Kansas Supreme Court Justice asks Ethics Commission for opinion

By Earl Glynn on February 18, 2010
Print This Article Print This Article

Kansas-Ethics-CommissionTopeka.  On Wednesday Kansas Supreme Court Justice Carol Beier asked the Ethics Commission whether the retention election for the position of Justice of the Kansas Supreme Court was governed by the Kansas Campaign Finance Act.

One member of the commission commented about the irony of a Supreme Court justice asking for an opinion in a legal matter.

The Commission opined that Kansas statute did not include the position of “Supreme Court Justice” in the definition of “state officer” so the Campaign Finance Act did not govern Beier’s retention election. 

Normally Supreme Court retention elections do not attract much attention, but recently Kansans for Life on their blog announced a “Fire Beier” campaign because of frustrations with several actions by Beier.

The consequence of this opinion is that both sides in Beier’s retention election can spend any amount of money and not file campaign finance reports.  One member of the commission speculated this law will likely be changed in the future.

Other matters addressed by the Ethics Commission included [page numbers are references to the document packet below]:

The next meeting will be on March 24, a week later than usual.

Update:  Opinions 2010-02 and 2010-03 were published on pp. 4-5 of the Kansas Register on Feb. 25.


Related


Follow us on Twitter @KansasWatchdog for live tweets from the Ethics Commission meeting:

2/17/2010

  • 12:57 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics First item at KS Gov Ethics meeting will be civil fine hearing with State Rep Don Hineman
  • 01:27 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics State Rep Hineman fined $100 for soliciting contributions in blackout period. Hineman turned himself in, is a model of how to act.
  • 01:27 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Vice Chair Tim Emert is chairing the Ethics meeting today in the absence of Chair Sabrina Stanidfer.
  • 01:30 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Plan to create short video of Hineman’s hearing. Commission complimented him on how he acted when he learned a mistake was made.
  • 01:34 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Several civil penalties being discussed. Kansas GOP has two $300 penalties for failure to file 10/27/2009 and 1/10/2009.
  • 01:37 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Two ethics opinions to be discussed. First is from Sen. Ty Masterson. Issue is conflict between gov spending and his position.
  • 01:39 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics 2nd opinion was requested by Sup. Ct. Justice Carol Beier about campaign finance and retention elections.
  • 01:40 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Vote on Ty Masterson opinion 2010-02 passed.
  • 01:41 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Ethics Commissioner comments about irony in State Supreme Court justice asking for an opinion.
  • 01:43 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Kansas Gov Ethics says it has no jurisdiction over retention election of State Supreme Court justice. That’s what the law says.
  • 01:45 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics 5 minute closed executive session beings. I am the only one that must leave.
  • 01:53 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Closed executive session extended another 5 minutes
  • 02:00 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Curious. Third closed executive session begins.
  • 02:05 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Open session. No motion from closed session.
  • 02:09 PM @KansasWatchdog: #ksethics Elon Torrence thanked for 16 years of service on KS Gov Ethics Commission.

Contact: Earl F Glynn, earl@kansaswatchdog.org, KansasWatchdog.org

Posted under Ethics, Judiciary, Kansas Government, News, Politics & Elections, Transparency.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

5 Comments For This Post So Far

  1. James
    8:03 pm on April 20th, 2010

    I learned a lot of information from this piece and will definitely keep it in my RSS. Thanks for the effort you took to expand upon this topic so thoroughly. I look forward to future posts.

Trackbacks

  1. “Turn yourself in” if you violate campaign finance rules

    [...] Kansas Supreme Court Justice asks Ethics Commission for opinion, Kansas Watchdog, Feb 18, 2010. [...]

  2. Kansas Supreme Court cautious about campaign finance proposal

    [...] 563 was introduced last week as a response to the opinion requested by Supreme Court Justice Carol Beier last month from the Kansas Governmental Ethi….  The Commission ruled Supreme Court judicial retention elections are not covered by existing [...]

  3. My view: Campaign Finance should cover judicial retention elections

    [...] attended the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission meeting last month where Supreme Court Justice Carol Beier ask… on whether the existing Campaign Finance Act covered judicial retention elections. While some may [...]

  4. Penalties for late filings are highlights of monthly Ethics Commission meeting

    [...] Kansas Supreme Court Justice asks Ethics Commission for opinion, Kansas Watchdog, Feb. 18, 2010. [...]

Leave a Reply

*

Powered by e1evation llc